🏅 LegalWriter, HLS '22 |

Yates v. United States

354 U.S. 298 (1957)

Tags: Legislation and Regulation, Statutory Interpretation

tl;dr: A fish does not fall under the term "tangible object" used in Section 1519 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. "Tangible object" in that section of the Act only includes objects used to record or preserve information.

Warning

Info

Yates v. United States

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Petitioner John Yates is a commercial fisherman who caught undersized...

Holding:Holding (Ginsburg): Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in response to...

Yates v. United States

Help us make LSD better!