Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Wilber v. Owens

(1949)

Supreme Court of New Jersey - 65 A.2d 843, 2 N.J. 167

tl;dr:

When the express purpose of a will is impossible to carry out, the court will look to the testator's general intent in construing the will.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Wilber v. Owens

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Wilber v. Owens case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingWilber v. Owens case brief facts & holding

Facts:William Bamford, the testator, had created a manuscript exploring various...

Holding:The court held that the will had a general charitable...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Wilber v. Owens case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Wilber v. Owens | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Hehek, J.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The case concerns the interpretation of a will and the validity of a charitable trust for scientific and philosophical research at Princeton University. The lower court found the trust to be valid under the doctrine of cy pres, despite the Vice-Chancellor's determination that the purpose of the trust was impossible to achieve. The appellant argues that the testator did not have a general charitable intent, but rather intended to complete and publish his research. The trust has a general charitable intention to advance education and learning, and it benefits a sufficiently large or indefinite class of people to give rise to community interest. The testator's intention in creating the trust was to use his "Random Scientific Notes" as the basis for continued philosophical and metaphysical research that would benefit mankind. The charitable intent of the trust does not depend on the scientific validity of his views or the depth of his understanding. The test of beneficence is met if the benefit is believed to be of public advantage, and the belief is at least rational and not contrary to the general law of the land or principles of morality.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Wilber v. Owens case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Wilber v. Owens case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Wilber v. Owens

Chat for Wilber v. Owens
brief-634
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.