Warning

Info

🏅 ALAB, SLS '24 |

0 0

Sullivan v. O'Connor

296 N.E.2d 183 (M.A. 1973)

tl;dr: Surgeon botches a nose job for an entertainer. She is entitled to recover for the pain and emotional distress she suffered.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff patient Sullivan is an entertainer and defendant doctor O’Connor...

Holding:Trial court judgment is affirmed. A mixture of reliance and...

Sullivan v. O'Connor

Chat for Sullivan v. O'Connor
brief-522
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you