Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Plessy v. Ferguson

(1896)

Supreme Court of the United States - 163 U.S. 537

tl;dr:

Upholds separate but equal.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Plessy v. Ferguson

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Plessy v. Ferguson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingPlessy v. Ferguson case brief facts & holding

Facts:Louisiana passed a law that required separate but equal accommodations...

Holding:The object of the 14th amendment is to enforce absolute...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Plessy v. Ferguson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Plessy v. Ferguson | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Mr. Justice Brown
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The case concerns the constitutionality of a Louisiana state law that requires railway companies to provide separate but equal accommodations for white and colored passengers. The plaintiff argues that the law violates his rights as a citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits states from making or enforcing laws that abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens, deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or deny any person within their jurisdiction equal protection of the laws. The Supreme Court distinguishes between laws that interfere with the political equality of African Americans and those that require racial segregation in public places. The case will determine whether the state law is constitutional or not.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Plessy v. Ferguson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Dissenting opinion, author: Me. Justice Harlan
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The Louisiana statute mandating separate but equal accommodations for white and colored passengers on trains violates civil rights and constitutes a badge of slavery or servitude, according to Justice Harlan's dissenting opinion. The statute contradicts the Constitution's principles of liberty and equality, and any state legislation regulating civil rights based on race will result in greater evils than the commingling of the two races on public highways. The court's decision allows for the possibility of hostile statutes requiring white and black jurors to be separated in the jury box by a "partition" or screens to prevent personal contact, but consistent with the Constitution according to the principles announced in this case.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Plessy v. Ferguson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Plessy v. Ferguson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Plessy v. Ferguson

Chat for Plessy v. Ferguson
brief-825
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.