Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co.

382 P.2d 109 (Sup. Ct. O.K. 1962)

tl;dr: Plaintiff leased land to Defendant for coal mining. One condition was that Defendant would strip mine and do remedial work to repair the land afterward. However, this work was not done, and it diminished the value of Plaintiff’s property.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff leased their land to Defendant for coal mining, one...

Holding:Affirmed in the modified amount of $300 in damages. Where...

Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co.

Chat for Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co.
brief-246
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you