Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Owen Equipment and Erection Co. v. Kroger

437 U.S. 365, 98 S.Ct. 2396 (1978)

tl;dr: Plaintiffs in diversity jurisdiction may not amend a suit to add a non-diverse party as the defendant, because it destroys diversity jurisdiction.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Kroger's husband was electrocuted and killed when the boom of...

Holding:Legislative history indicates a congressional mandate that diversity jurisdiction is...

Owen Equipment and Erection Co. v. Kroger

Chat for Owen Equipment and Erection Co. v. Kroger
brief-277
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you