Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Mullendore Theatres v. Growth Realty Investors Co.

691 P.2d 970 (1984)

tl;dr: A promise to return the security deposit or else spend it to improve the property is not a covenant that runs with the land; it is merely an obligation on the original lessor.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:There was a lease agreement between the owner of a...

Holding:The court held that the covenant in the original lease...

Mullendore Theatres v. Growth Realty Investors Co.

Chat for Mullendore Theatres v. Growth Realty Investors Co.
brief-602
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you