Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… ALAB, SLS '24 |

0 0

Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling-Mill

119 U.S. 149 (1886)

tl;dr: Company proposes a modified acceptance, which offeror rejects. Company then attempts to accept the original terms, but no contract is formed because their power of acceptance has been terminated.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff MSLR asks for a price quote for 2000-5000 tons...

Holding:Trial court's judgment is affirmed. MSLRโ€™s modified acceptance was not...

Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling-Mill

Chat for Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling-Mill
brief-400
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you