0 0
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - 941 F.2d 588
Tags: Contracts, good faith
The legal case involves a contract dispute between J.C. Penney Company and General Electric Pension Trust over a sale and leaseback arrangement. The court confirms diversity of citizenship between the parties and reminds lawyers and judges to carefully monitor federal jurisdiction, especially in diversity cases involving unconventional entities such as partnerships and trusts. The judge granted summary judgment for the pension trust on the grounds that Market Street Associates failed to mention paragraph 34 of the lease in their correspondence with the pension trust, which prevented negotiations over financing, a condition precedent to the lessee's exercise of the purchase option. The judge also found that this failure violated the duty of good faith, which is read into every contract in Wisconsin. The duty of good faith prohibits opportunistic behavior that a mutually dependent, cooperative relationship might facilitate without any governing rules. The concept of "good faith" in contracts could be replaced with the idea of implied conditions that are necessary due to the unpredictability of the future at the time the contract was made. The district judge agreed with the pension trust's argument that Market Street Associates has a possible remedy, and therefore, the pension trust's position is untenable.
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.