Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 Okapi13, SLS '24 |
0
0
Larry Bowling v. Max Sperry
133 Ind.App. 692 (Appellate court of Indiana, 1962)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Capacity
tl;dr:
Don't sell a car to a kid as they likely retain the right to void your contract at will.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Plaintiff Bowling, a 16 year-old minor, purchased an automobile from...
Holding:
The trial court was reversed as a matter of law...
Larry Bowling v. Max Sperry
Chat for Larry Bowling v. Max Sperry
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-94
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you