Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… ALAB, SLS '24 |

0 0

Jacob & Youngs v. Kent

129 N.E. 889 (N.Y. 1921)

tl;dr: Homeowner contracts for builder to use a specific pipe. Builder uses the wrong kind, but substantially performs, so homeowner is not entitled to damages.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff J&Y built a house for Defendant Kent. The contract...

Holding:Appellate court decision in favor of J&Y is affirmed. J&Y...

Jacob & Youngs v. Kent

Chat for Jacob & Youngs v. Kent
brief-511
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you