🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

J.O. Hooker & Sons, Inc. v, Roberts Cabinet Co.

683 So. 2d 396 (Miss. 1996)

Tags: Contracts, Breach, Remedies, Expectation damages

tl;dr: General contractor Defendant works with subcontractor Plaintiff cabinet company, and Defendant unilaterally terminated the contract after a dispute arose.

Warning

Info

J.O. Hooker & Sons, Inc. v, Roberts Cabinet Co.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant general contractor works with Plaintiff subcontractor cabinet company. Defendant...

Holding:Remittitur for storage costs granted, but all other damages affirmed....

J.O. Hooker & Sons, Inc. v, Roberts Cabinet Co.

Help us make LSD better!