Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ Chris22, HLS '22 |
0
0
Intel Corporation v. Hamidi
71 P.3d 296 (2003)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Property
,
Trespass to chattels
tl;dr:
Sending disparaging emails to employees on a company's email servers does not constitute a trespass to chattels.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
The defendant had regularly emailed people on the plaintiff's email...
Holding:
The defendant did not commit a trespass to chattels. The...
Intel Corporation v. Hamidi
Chat for Intel Corporation v. Hamidi
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-547
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you