Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Okapi13, SLS '24 |

0 0

Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.

127 N.H. 187 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1985)

tl;dr: Lost profits from sale must be certain, not speculative, to serve as a basis for consequential damages.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Hydraform contracted with Defendant American Steel to purchase enough...

Holding:The Supreme Court of New Hampshire affirmed that Hydraform was...

Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.

Chat for Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.
brief-115
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you