Warning

Info

🏅 Jawshu, CLS '24 |

0 0

Hayes v. Plantations Steel Co.

438 A.2d 1091 (1982)

tl;dr: An employer promised to pay a longtime employee in retirement, but reneged after the employer fell under new ownership. The promise was not enforceable because there was no consideration or reliance.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Edward Hayes (plaintiff) sued Plantations Steel Company (defendant) for breach...

Holding:There is no implied-in-fact contract that can be determined from...

Hayes v. Plantations Steel Co.

Chat for Hayes v. Plantations Steel Co.
brief-83
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you