Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Goodisson v. Nunn

4 T.R. 762, 100 Eng. Rep. 1288 (KB 1792)

tl;dr: Plaintiff and Defendant agreed on the sale of an estate. If either party did not do their part of the contract, they were supposed to pay the other £21. Plaintiff never offered to sell the estate, but then sued Defendant for the £21.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Goodisson sold Defendant Nunn a property, and their contract...

Holding:Judgment for Defendant. In order to recover for breach, a...

Goodisson v. Nunn

Chat for Goodisson v. Nunn
brief-227
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you