Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five

(1959)

Florida District Court of Appeal - 114 So. 2d 357

Tags: Property

tl;dr:

A landowner can use his property in a manner that blocks his neighbor's access to freely flowing air and sunlight, because the free flow of air and sunlight is not a legal right.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingFontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five case brief facts & holding

Facts:The two parties are hotel corporations. The plaintiff hotel had...

Holding:The appeals court reversed, holding that the defendant was free...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: PER CURIAM.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

This case involves an appeal against a temporary injunction that prohibits the construction of a fourteen-story addition to the Fontainebleau Hotel due to potential interference with light and air on the beach in front of the Eden Roc Hotel. The lower court erred in not considering the building ordinance requiring a 100-foot setback from the ocean. The maxim "sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas" does not prohibit a property owner from using their property in a way that may cause harm to their neighbor, as long as it does not infringe on the lawful rights of others. In American law, a landowner does not have a legal right to the free flow of light and air across their neighbor's property, unless there is an easement or uninterrupted use and enjoyment for a period of 20 years. The English doctrine of "ancient lights" has been rejected in the United States. If a structure serves a useful and beneficial purpose, it does not give rise to a cause of action for damages or an injunction under the maxim sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas, even if it causes injury to another by cutting off light and air and interfering with the view that would otherwise be available over adjoining land in its natural state.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five

Chat for Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five
brief-653
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.