Warning

Info

πŸ… Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Finley v. United States

490 U.S. 545 (1989)

tl;dr: Pendent party jurisdiction may not allow the federal courts to adjudicate a claim against a party who would not otherwise be subject to federal jurisdiction simply because it arose from a common nucleus of operative fact as a claim against another party

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🀯 High points 🀯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Finley's husband and two children died when a plane struck...

Holding:This encompasses the difference between pendent-party jurisdiction, versus pendent-claim jurisdiction.Plaintiff...

Finley v. United States

Chat for Finley v. United States
brief-278
πŸ‘ Chat vibe: 0 πŸ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you