🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Farese v. McGarry

237 N.J. Super. 385 (App. 1989)

tl;dr: Under his lease's terms, Defendant believed that he would have an option to renew. Pursuant to this understanding, he made improvements to the property. But Plaintiff insisted that Defendant overstayed his lease and told him to vacate the property.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant McGarry rented a home from Plaintiff Farese subject to...

Holding:Affirmed with modified judgment. The proper measure of damages is...

Farese v. McGarry

Chat for Farese v. McGarry
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you