Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno

(1944)

Supreme Court of California - 24 Cal. 2d 453

tl;dr:

Plaintiff is injured when a bottle of Coke explodes in her hand and she sues Defendant bottler; Court holds that Defendant's negligence is inferred under res ipsa loquitur.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingEscola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno case brief facts & holding

Facts:Plaintiff Escola was injured when a soda bottle broke in...

Holding:The California Supreme Court affirmed. The Court noted that while...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: GIBSON, C. J.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The plaintiff, a waitress, sued a bottling and delivery company for negligence after a bottle of Coca Cola broke in her hand causing injury. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff based on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, despite the defendant's argument that it did not apply and the broken bottle was not produced as evidence. The application of the doctrine in cases involving exploding bottles of carbonated beverages has been controversial, but it may apply if the defendant had exclusive control of the object causing the injury and the accident would not normally occur in the absence of negligence by the defendant. The plaintiff must also prove that they handled the object carefully and that there was no action on their part contributing to the accident. Legal authorities such as Honea v. City Dairy, Inc. and Prosser on Torts support this approach.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Opinion (Concurrence), author: TRAYNOR, J.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The author argues that manufacturers should be strictly liable for injuries caused by defective products they place on the market, regardless of negligence. The Health and Safety Code imposes strict liability on manufacturers for producing adulterated food that may be injurious to health. The retailer is absolutely liable to their customer for implied warranties, including safety, and can recoup losses from the wholesaler or manufacturer. It would be more efficient for the injured person to base their action directly on the manufacturer's warranty.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno

Chat for Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno
brief-616
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.