0 0
Franklin Circuit Court - 15 Ohio C.D. 663, 15 Ohio C.C. Dec. 663
Tags: Contracts, Specific performance, Breach, Remedies
The case involves an appeal from a lower court's decision to dismiss Columbus' petitions against Cleveland and Pittsburgh railway companies. The city seeks to enforce a contract for the construction of a viaduct on High street, which requires the railway companies to erect buildings on their property facing the viaduct and High street approaches to obstruct the view of cars and engines. The defendants argue that the city lacked the authority to enter into the contract, that courts typically do not order specific performance for building contracts, and that the contract is too vague to serve as a basis for such a decree. The court recognizes that the city lacks the administrative power to enforce the building of structures, but as a private business corporation, it has the authority to enter into contracts that benefit the community. The court has jurisdiction to enforce specific performance of a contract for defined work on the defendant's property, in which the plaintiff has a material interest and which cannot be compensated for by damages. The court will enforce specific performance of a covenant when it is necessary for justice and damages are inadequate. This exception also applies when there has been part performance and the defendant is enjoying the benefits. The contract must be sufficiently defined, and the court will compel a party to perform a contract in specie when they have already enjoyed the benefits of the contract.
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.