Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 Okapi13, SLS '24 |
0
0
Christopher Specht v. Netscape Communications Corporation
306 F.3d 17 (2nd Circuit, 2002)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Browsewrap
tl;dr:
A hidden software "browsewrap" agreement does not place a downloader on notice as to additional terms.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Plaintiff Specht and others visited Defendant Netscape’s website to download...
Holding:
Judge Sotomayor affirmed the district court. As a matter of...
Christopher Specht v. Netscape Communications Corporation
Chat for Christopher Specht v. Netscape Communications Corporation
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-92
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you