Warning

Info

🏅 Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Systems

303 F. Supp. 2d 766 (2004)

tl;dr: This case gives an example of an FRCP 11 sanction for filing a complaint with allegations that are not supported by facts.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts: Dupont bans the display of Confederate flags on its...

Holding:The employees’ complaint alleges that Du Pont’s ban of Confederate...

Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Systems

Chat for Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Systems
brief-309
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you