Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 Pilea, HLS '24 |
0
0
Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Systems
303 F. Supp. 2d 766 (2004)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Civil Procedure
,
Sanctions
tl;dr:
This case gives an example of an FRCP 11 sanction for filing a complaint with allegations that are not supported by facts.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Dupont bans the display of Confederate flags on its...
Holding:
The employees’ complaint alleges that Du Pont’s ban of Confederate...
Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Systems
Chat for Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Systems
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-309
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you