🏅 Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548 (1986)

tl;dr: When a defendant moves for summary judgment, they must meet the burden of showing that the non-movant lacks sufficient facts.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Catrett sued a number of asbestos manufacturers/distributors in district court,...

Holding:Under FRCP 56, the party motioning for summary judgment does...

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

Chat for Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you