Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 Pilea, HLS '24 |
0
0
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548 (1986)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Civil Procedure
,
Summary Judgment
tl;dr:
When a defendant moves for summary judgment, they must meet the burden of showing that the non-movant lacks sufficient facts.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Catrett sued a number of asbestos manufacturers/distributors in district court,...
Holding:
Under FRCP 56, the party motioning for summary judgment does...
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
Chat for Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-312
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you