🏅 ALAB, SLS '24 |

0 0

Beneficial National Bank v. Payton

214 F. Supp. 2d 679 (M.S. 2001)

tl;dr: Credit card company modified terms of agreement to include a mandatory arbitration provision. Consumer did not object to modification per the original agreement, so the arbitration provision was binding.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Credit card agreement between Plaintiff Payton and Defendant Beneficial included...

Holding:The arbitration provision is valid and arbitration is ordered to...

Beneficial National Bank v. Payton

Chat for Beneficial National Bank v. Payton
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you