0 0
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division - 80 A.D.2d 318
Tags: Contracts, damages calculation, breach
See also: Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal
The defendant, a demolition and excavating contractor, failed to complete the grading and removal of structures on a 26-acre property owned by the plaintiffs. The lower court awarded the plaintiffs a $90,000 judgment, which the defendant appealed. The court held that the cost of completion was the proper measure of damages, as the defendant failed to perform as agreed. The defendant argued that the proper measure of damage is diminution in value, not the cost of completion, but the court rejected this argument. The general rule for damages in a construction contract breach is that the injured party can recover damages that are the direct and immediate consequence of the breach and were in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made. If there has been substantial performance of the contract made in good faith, but defects exist, the damages are measured as the difference between the value of the property as constructed and the value if performance had been properly completed. The court affirmed the lower court's decision and rejected the defendant's argument that the contract did not require the removal of all subsurface foundations.
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.