Warning

Info

🏅 ALAB, SLS '24 |

0 0

Alaska Packers’ Ass'n v. Domenico

117 F. 99 (9th Circuit 1902)

tl;dr: Fisherman strike for increased pay during time-sensitive season, and unable to find replacements, the contractor agrees. Accession to their demands was not enforceable under preexisting duty rule.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant Alaska Packers’ Association (APA) contracted with plaintiff fishermen to...

Holding:District court judgment is reversed. Fishermen had no valid cause to...

Alaska Packers’ Ass'n v. Domenico

Chat for Alaska Packers’ Ass'n v. Domenico
brief-383
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you