Warning

Info

🏅 ALAB, SLS '24 |

0 0

Alaska Northern Development v. Alyeska Pipeline Service

666 P.2d 33 (A.K. 1983)

tl;dr: Parol evidence is inadmissible for a partially integrated letter of intent, where such external evidence would contradict the integrated portion of the writing.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff AND initiated discussions with Defendant Alyeska for purchase of...

Holding:Trial court's judgment is affirmed.The 12/11/76 letter was partially integrated;...

Alaska Northern Development v. Alyeska Pipeline Service

Chat for Alaska Northern Development v. Alyeska Pipeline Service
brief-520
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you